MARGARET SANGER-- RACIST

In light of the recent Planned Parenthood undercover videos, where babies are shown to be born alive and then killed for profit, more attention and scrutiny have been given to the organization’s founder, Margaret Sanger.

Margaret Sanger was arguably the largest advocate of eugenics in United States history, and her influence lives on in the 700 Planned Parenthood abortion clinics throughout the country -- 79 percent of which are located in predominantly black and Hispanic communities.

Please call (888) 317-2837 and ask them to remove this bust!

Eugenics (the notion and practice of removing “unfit” members of society through selective breeding and sterilization) was Sanger’s largest and most lasting crusade. Here are some of her controversial statements on the matter:

• “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population."
• “Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race."
• “I believe that there should be no more babies.”

As a result, a coalition of black pastors has petitioned the Smithsonian Institute to remove a prominent bust of Sanger from the Congressionally-funded National Portrait Gallery in Washington D.C. The bust of Sanger appears as part of their “Struggle for Justice” exhibit along with baseball player Jackie Robinson and Martin Luther King, Jr.

However, the National Portrait Gallery has refused to comply with this request and continues to memorialize someone who is highly controversial and extremely offensive.

That is why we need your help by calling the Smithsonian Institute directly and asking them to remove this bust!

Please call (888) 317-2837 and be sure to let them know that our taxpayer dollars should not be used to honor a woman who wanted to exterminate everyone that she deemed "unfit".

As always, we appreciate your support.

Sincerely,

The MRC Action Team

HOMOSEXUAL PLANS REVEALED IN THE NATION MAGAZINE

Most people didn't see the chilling article that appeared in The Nation, a major left-wing
magazine, the day before the U.S. Supreme Court "gay marriage" ruling came out. The article
outlines where the LGBT movement is going after "gay marriage." And it makes clear why Mass Resistance will be changing our focus to more overt activism.
Since that horrible ruling in June, a lot of pro-family people think the LGBT movement has
finally gotten what they've wanted, so is placated. and that we should now-focus on protecting
ourselves from the ruling's effects the best we can.
But in fact, the LGBT movement is never "satisfied." They have big plans for further attacks.
And we need to respond.
The Nation article, "What's Next for the LGBT Movement?", focuses on four high-profile
LGBT activists who reveal that "gay marriage" was never their final goal. The LGBT movement
will not be stopping to rest. Their plan is to delegitimize and crush all opposition to their agenda
everywhere in America - particularly in the churches -- no matter how small.

Some of the things the article outlined:-

-- "Dis-establish marriage." "Gay marriage" was simply a stepping stone. Their actual
goal is that there be no formal marriage rules at all. This means group marriages are next,
then incestuous marriages, and later even marriages to minors. It would simply be up to
the neople directly involved to decide.

-- Pass strong LGBT "non-discrimination" laws across the US. These are the laws that
force bakers to bake "gay marriage" cakes or face huge punishments. Such laws would
also force schools to include LGBT indoctrination. Most states still do not have the
onerous laws the LGBT movement demands. The activists refer to those states (mostly in
the South and Midwest) as "zones without rights" in their propaganda.

-- Ban all "religious liberty" laws. They consider religious liberty to be a dangerous ploy
to "undermine all civil rights laws" that must be stopped at all costs. All people must be
forced to follow the LGBT agenda, with no exceptions.

-- Demonize pro-family conservatives and silence all dissent. They plan to direct
"massive amounts of funds" to "expose and defeat the right wing" across America.

-- Push a radical political agenda. They plan to leverage their power to support Marxist
economic policies, the right to "early term abortion," and similar policies. 

How should pro-family groups react to this threat? Most groups are simply hunkering down to
defend against the attacks on religious liberty.
But Mass Resistance has a different approach. Their whole program must be confronted or we
will be buried. Using what resources we have, we believe in taking the offensive. This means
challenging that movement everywhere we can. It means not holding back on telling the
unabashed truth. (For example, most conservatives are squeamish about talking about the welldocumented
medical and psychological destructiveness of homosexual behavior. We're not.)

Sometimes it means getting out in the
street. For example: recently, a major
hospital in Boston expelled a
prominent physician, Dr. Paul Church,
from their staff. His crime? Voicing
concerns to his colleagues about the
unhealthy nature of homosexual
behavior. He also talked about the moral
and Biblical issues involved. (We've
reported extensively about this on the
Mass Resistance website.) He's appealing
that action, but the hospital
administration is adamant about
terminating him.
Mass Resistance has not stood silent
about this. We have been helping
thousands of people across the country
call and email the hospital administration
demanding Dr. Church be brought back.
Just yesterday a team of Mass Resistance
activists protested outside the hospital,
and handed out leaflets to hundreds of
people.
Taking to the streets. Mass Resistance activists
holding signs and leafleting outside of Dr. Church's
hospital in downtown Boston.
We are facing nothing less than the eventual criminalization of Christianity and conservative
values, We think it's vitally important that this be confronted at every turn. But all this takes
resources. We're willing and eager to do it. And your continued financial support will make it
happen!
Sincerely,

Brian Camenker
President
Mass Resistance

CONSERVATIVE VIEWS OF SOME CARDINALS

(Life Site News Post by

Lisa Bourne and Maike Hickson)

---

Catholic Church, Specialty pages, Vatican Synod on the FamilyMon Aug 24, 2015 - 3:20 pm EST

Conservative cardinals strike back in new books, defend the faith ahead of Synod

catholic , ignatius press , synod on the family

ROME, August 24, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) -- Church leaders are striking back against assaults on marriage and family in a slate of new books countering proposals seeking to circumvent Church teaching at the upcoming Vatican Synod in October.
Four titles coming out in Ignatius Press’ fall releases all refute challenges to Catholic principles in the hot-button areas of marriage and human sexuality, with special consideration for the upcoming Ordinary Synod on the Family.
Authored by prominent Church figures representing the Church’s orthodox leaders, they directly address the contentious issues expected to be the focus of the Synod. Two of the books gather roughly a half-dozen cardinals or bishops to write in defense of the Church.
Ignatius Press Founder and Editor Father Joseph Fessio, S.J. told LifeSiteNews those at the publishing house felt the topic was important, and they wanted to give a voice to those “who have something substantial to say, and who are both deeply rooted in the Church’s long tradition and aware of the challenges of contemporary culture.”
Last year’s Extraordinary Synod on the Family was fraught with controversy, with some liberal bishops attempting to thwart Church teaching in the areas of marriage and sexuality, most notably German Cardinal Walter Kasper’s proposal to allow Communion for divorced and civilly remarried Catholics. Homosexual advocates have also made a concerted continual push for their agenda to be advanced at the Synod as well.
The attempts to sidestep Church principles were masked as “a more pastoral approach” to the moral questions of Communion for divorced and civilly remarried Catholics and homosexuality.
“Nothing which conflicts with authoritative teaching can be pastoral,” Father Fessio told LifeSiteNews.
The four new books are not the first literary effort to defend the Church’s teaching at the Synod.
Five cardinals collaborated to write the book Remaining in the "Truth of Christ: Marriage and Communion in the Catholic Church" to defend Church teaching on marriage and family ahead of the 2014 gathering, and sent the book to the bishops taking part. Reports surfaced later that the Synod lead organizer took steps to block the book’s distribution to the bishops.
Three bishops penned another book this past spring, "Preferential Option for the Family — 100 Questions and Answers Relating to the Synod", to clear up the Synod confusion on Church teaching.
One of the Synod’s most provocative moments last year was when Cardinal Kasper was recorded dismissing the voice of African Catholics in the area of Church teaching on homosexuality.
African cardinals “should not tell us too much what we have to do,” Cardinal Kasper stated in an interview with ZENIT news agency, adding that he didn’t think the other Synod participants were listening to the African bishops either.
Cardinal Kasper also said Africans were “very different” about homosexuals, and that, “You can’t speak about this with Africans and people of Muslim countries. It’s not possible. It’s a taboo. For us, we say we ought not to discriminate, we don’t want to discriminate in certain respects.”
While African bishops were not being listened to at the Synod, he said, their views are “of course” listened to in Africa, “where it’s taboo.”
Cardinal Kasper initially denied his statements but was forced to walk back his denial after the recording of the interview was released.
In the wake of the ideological and cultural divide at the Synod highlighted by the incident, one of Ignatius’s fall releases is "Christ’s New Homeland - Africa – A contribution to the Synod on the Family", by 10 African cardinals and bishops.
The contributors include Cardinals Robert Sarah, Francis Arinze, Christian Tumi, Théodore Sarr, and Archbishop Samuel Kleda.
Cardinal Sarah, prefect for the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments at the Vatican, was appointed in 2014 by Pope Francis. He has stated emphatically that any attempt to separate Catholic teaching from “pastoral practice” is a form of “heresy and a dangerous schizophrenic pathology.”
“The African Church will strongly oppose any rebellion against the teaching of Jesus and the Magisterium,” the Guinean cardinal has also said.
Cardinal Arinze provides the preface for the African cardinals’ book.
“The African prelates make a concise presentation of the attitude of Africans toward marriage and the family,” Cardinal Arinze wrote. “Africans see the family as a community of love between a man and a woman, with a loving opening to children. Marriage is the entry. It comes from the creating hands of God, and so no human being has the authority to try to re-invent it. A marriage in Africa establishes a link between the families of the man and the woman, with each side ready to help to make it a success. Appreciation of the complementarity of man and woman and of the divine origin of marriage and the family cuts across cultural, linguistic, and religious frontiers.”
“Marriage and the family are in crisis,” states the preview from another of the new books, "Eleven Cardinals Speak – On Marriage and the Family", an international collection of essays from 11 princes of the Church.
"Eleven Cardinals Speak" gives an introduction to the upcoming October Synod and discusses pertinent issues such as divorced and civilly remarried Catholics and the demands of authentic pastoral care.
Contributors are Cardinals Sarah, Carlo Caffarra, Baselios Cleemis, Paul Josef Cordes, Dominik Duka, Joachim Meisner, Camillo Ruini, Antonio María Rouco Varela, Willem Jacobus Eijk, John Onaiyekan, and Jorge L. Urosa Savino.

Click "like" to support Catholics Restoring the Culture!

Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, the archbishop of Bologna, has said there can be no contradiction between what Church teaching on marriage and actual practice.
German Cardinal Paul Josef Cordes has publicly opposed the words and direction of the German Bishops' Conference in moving to separate itself from Rome.
Cardinal Sarah has his own book in the crop of four from Ignatius, the autobiographical interview "God or Nothing – A Conversation on Faith" with Nicolas Diat.
In it, Cardinal Sarah states, “The idea of putting Magisterial teaching in a beautiful display case while separating it from pastoral practice, which then could evolve along with circumstances, fashions and passions, is a sort of heresy, a dangerous schizophrenic pathology. I therefore solemnly state that the Church in Africa is staunchly opposed to any rebellion against the teaching of Jesus and of the Magisterium.”
Also coming from the publishing house this fall is "Living the Truth in Love – Pastoral Approaches to Same Sex Attraction".
Edited by Professor Janet Smith and Father Paul Check, the book is in answer to questions posed in the Lineamenta, or guideline document, for the Synod and looks at ways to provide pastoral help to those with same-sex attraction in the light of the Gospel.
Father Fessio told LifeSiteNews the four new books will all be available well before the Synod to participants and any other interested parties, and they are an effort to ensure the Synod serves to uphold the Church’s sacramental mission of sanctifying and saving souls.
“What contradicts God’s Commandments is harmful to those who transgress, to others around them, and to society. It can also endanger one’s eternal destiny,” Father Fessio said. “The most compassionate and loving thing the Church can do is to speak clearly and pray for open hearts to receive the message of Jesus.”

PLANNED PARENTHOOD'S EVIL PRACTICES

Lisa Bourne

---

Abortion, Bioethics, Politics - U.S. Tue Aug 18, 2015 - 7:48 am EST

Obama admin to Congress: It’s perfectly legal for Planned Parenthood to harvest babies’ organs

abortion , center for medical progress cmp , hhs , joni ernst , planned parenthood , sylvia mathews burwell

August 18, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) -- President Obama's Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) told Congress late last week that Planned Parenthood has been following the law in its practice of attaining fetal tissue and body parts for sale.
HHS also insisted it does not fund fetal tissue research or elective abortion through Planned Parenthood. Rather, it gives the nation's largest abortion provider money for its "critical health services."
In a letter sent late Friday and addressed to Sens. Joni Ernst and Roy Blunt, HHS's assistant secretary for legislation contended that HHS "knows of no violations" of U.S. fetal tissue laws on the part of government researchers or the companies that supply the tissue, and said also that HHS takes the word of non-profits supplying it fetal tissue for research that they are operating in line with all aspects of the law.
"Currently, we know of no violation of these laws in connection with the research done at our agencies," stated Jim Esquea in the letter. "Furthermore … we have confirmed that HHS researchers working with fetal tissue obtained the tissue from non-profit organizations that provided assurances to us that they are in compliance with all applicable legal requirements."

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

Sen. Ernst's office provided a copy of the letter to LifeSiteNews. While the senator is away on military duty, a spokesperson for her provided the following response:

Senator Ernst is still reviewing the letter and there are several state and congressional investigations into Planned Parenthood's selling of baby body parts. As she has stated, Senator Ernst does not believe that taxpayers should be forced to foot the bill for roughly a half a billion dollars annually for an organization exhibiting such disrespect for human life.

In its letter, HHS also said fetal tissue research has been significant in efforts to cure disease and plays a vital part in vaccine development.
"The use of fetal tissue in medical research has been an instrumental component of our attempts to understand, treat, and cure a number of conditions and diseases that affect millions of Americans," the letter stated. "In addition, research using cell lines derived from fetal tissue has also played an essential role in the field of vaccine development."
This is disputed by Debi Vinnedge, executive director for Children of God for Life, which advocates for ethical vaccines.
"Fetal tissue research has not produced great advances in medicines," Vinnedge told LifeSiteNews. "In fact, there is not one single use of aborted fetal tissue or cells that has not been accomplished using moral sources as well." 
Federal research on fetal tissue has gotten more attention in the month since the first in a series of undercover videos was released showing various high-ranking Planned Parenthood executives negotiating the sale of fetal body parts and tissue from children aborted at its facilities.
The videos raise the possibility of Planned Parenthood profiting from the sale of fetal remains, and also show the abortion giant planning specific abortion procedures to best allow for procurement of intact body parts, both in violation of federal law.
Also exposed by the videos was Planned Parenthood's willful use of partial-birth abortion to harvest fetal body parts and its stealing aborted baby body parts without the consent of the babies' mothers, both also against federal law.
Ernst and Blunt were the top two signatories in a July 22 letter from 50 U.S. senators to HHS Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell questioning Planned Parenthood's practices and whether they are in compliance with federal laws pertaining to the use of fetal tissue and partial-birth abortion.
Taxpayers have funded two federal agencies that purchase aborted children's remains over the last seven years with more than $300,000.  The National Institutes of Health and Food and Drug Administration both take part in research using fetal tissue.
Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR), identified in the Planned Parenthood videos as a fetal tissue supplier, has received $257,000 from the NIH and roughly $73,000 from the FDA since 2009.
The letter told Congress that it had assurances from fetal tissue providers to the NIH and FDA that their tissue procurement was in accordance with the law.
HHS concluded with the qualification of the funding that it does provide to the nation's largest abortion chain, and listing its self-styled services.
"While HHS provides funding to Planned Parenthood federation of America through competitively-awarded grants and contracts, the funding does not support research involving fetal tissue," it said. "Instead the funds are used to provide critical health services, including annual wellness exams, cancer screenings, contraception, and to further the study of sexually transmitted diseases."
Planned Parenthood claims that abortion makes up only 3% of its services, when statistics bear out that the number of abortions it performs far outweigh its other activities. Planned Parenthood and its advocates also continually claim that the abortion behemoth needs federal funding to provide mammograms, when it does not provide them, instead referring women to other organizations that do.

NEW SIGN REPLACES THE STOLEN ONES

                                      

                                            

This is my new sign (the Nazi thugs stole two previous signs). You notice that there is a chair near the sign

That is because in our lawless society today we are the first responders. I am going to guard my property

with enough force to deter the Nazi thugs.

   It doesn't surprise me that the Nazi thugs stole my signs. They hate the truth and love holocausts. The 

killing of innocent babies in the womb in the USA is a NATIONAL HOLOCAUST !!!!! Since 

Roe v Wade decision by our US Supreme Court judges(who are our modern gods on Mt Olympus.)

millions of of innocent babies in the womb have been slaughtered by any kind of heinous means devised by 

adult human beings for any ridiculous reasons they can come up with..

  The decision RvW was based on the premise that the judges did not know when human life begins--if

you can believe that!!!!! RvW will end up on the ash heap of history like Dred Scott, etc.etc. 

Science and history will overturn RvW.

GOOD PRO-LIFE COURT RULING

AbortionThu Aug 13, 2015 - 8:23 pm EST

BREAKING: Court denies StemExpress request to access, block aborted baby part videos

John Jalsevac Follow John

• 
  
• 
  

abortion , planned parenthood , planned parenthood organ harvesting scandal , ppsellsbabyparts

August 13, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) - A judge with the Superior Court of the State of California issued a ruling this afternoon denying a request by StemExpress to access videos and documentation obtained by the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) during its investigation into Planned Parenthood's practice of harvesting and selling the body parts of aborted babies.
Judge Joanne O’Donnell argued that the requested injunction, which would have prevented CMP from releasing some of their undercover footage featuring high level StemExpress employees, would violate CMP's First Amendment rights.
The ruling comes two weeks after O'Donnell issued a narrow temporary restraining order preventing CMP from releasing further undercover video footage taken at a meeting with the three top-level staff at a restaurant in May.
StemExpress plays a central part in the scandal exposed by many of the six "sting" videos released by CMP in recent weeks. Those videos depict Planned Parenthood officials haggling over the prices of aborted baby parts, or sorting through the body parts of aborted babies in a lab - body parts which are then acquired by StemExpress.
The biomedical firm, which advertises that it “fiscally rewards clinics” who provide it with baby parts for research, had also tried to block the release of several documents posted on the CMP website, including a price list for baby parts. That request was previously denied by Judge O'Donnell.
Pro-life leaders welcomed today's decision.
"The Court has rightly stopped Stem Express from using a meritless lawsuit to try to silence the Center for Medical Progress," said Casey Mattox, Senior Counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom. "Americans have a right to know the truth about Planned Parenthood and its business deals with Stem Express. This decision brings us one step closer to the day Stem Express and Planned Parenthood have been dreading.”
“As has been more than apparent from the videos that have been released, StemExpress and Planned Parenthood have plenty to hide," said Life Legal Defense Foundation Vice President of Legal Affairs Catherine Short. "These videos not only expose the potential illegality of Planned Parenthood’s actions, they expose the grisly, inhuman nature of Planned Parenthood’s business."
In the ruling Judge O’Donnell tossed the injunction request, saying that StemExpress was highly unlikely to prevail in its efforts.
“Plaintiff does not persuade the Court that the discovery it seeks is necessary to obtain the preliminary injunction. That is because it appears unlikely that the Court is going to grant the preliminary injunction,” Judge O’Donnell said in her Thursday order.
“The injunction Plaintiff seeks would prevent Defendants from disseminating the videotapes,” the judge added, explaining, "this proposed injunction would constitute a prior restraint on the Defendants’ rights under the First Amendment and the parallel protections under the California Constitution.”

COMMON SENSE BY ARCHB. CHAPUT OF PHILA.

August 10, 2015
ARCHBISHOP CHAPUT'S WEEKLY COLUMN:
THERE IS NO EQUIVALENCE

Here's a simple exercise in basic reasoning. On a spectrum of bad things to do, theft is bad, assault is worse and murder is worst. There's a similar texture of ill will connecting all three crimes, but only a very confused conscience would equate thieving and homicide. Both are serious matters. But there is no equivalence. The deliberate killing of innocent life is a uniquely wicked act. No amount of contextualizing or deflecting our attention to other issues can obscure that.

This is precisely why Cardinal John O'Connor, Bishop James McHugh and others pressed so hard for the passage of the U.S. bishops' 1998 pastoral letter, Living the Gospel of Life. As Cardinal Joseph Bernardin once wisely noted, Catholic social teaching is a seamless garment of respect for human life, from conception to natural death. It makes no sense to champion the cause of unborn children if we ignore their basic needs once they're born. Thus it's no surprise that - year in and year out - nearly all Catholic dioceses in the United States, including Philadelphia, devote far more time, personnel and material resources to providing social services to the poor and education to young people than to opposing abortion.

But of course, children need to survive the womb before they can have needs like food, shelter, immigration counseling and good health care. Humanity's priority right - the one that undergirds all other rights - is the right to life. As the American bishops wrote in 1998:

"Opposition to abortion and euthanasia does not excuse indifference to those who suffer from poverty, violence and injustice. Any politics of human life must work to resist the violence of war and the scandal of capital punishment. Any politics of human dignity must seriously address issues of racism, poverty, hunger, employment, education, housing, and health care . . . But being 'right' in such matters can never excuse a wrong choice regarding direct attacks on innocent human life. Indeed, the failure to protect and defend life in its most vulnerable stages renders suspect any claims to the 'rightness' of positions in other matters affecting the poorest and least powerful of the human community. If we understand the human person as the 'temple of the Holy Spirit' -- the living house of God -- then these latter issues fall logically into place as the crossbeams and walls of that house. All direct attacks on innocent human life, such as abortion and euthanasia, strike at the house's foundation. These directly and immediately violate the human person's most fundamental right -- the right to life. Neglect of these issues is the equivalent of building our house on sand. Such attacks cannot help but lull the social conscience in ways ultimately destructive of other human rights" (22).

A case is sometimes made that abortion is mainly a cultural and moral issue, and politics is a poor solution to the problem. The curious thing is that some of the same voices that argue against political action on the abortion issue seem quite comfortable urging vigorous political engagement on issues like health care, homelessness and the environment. In practice, politics is the application of moral conviction to public discourse and the process of lawmaking. Law not only constrains and defends; it also teaches and forms. Law not only reflects culture; it shapes and reshapes it. That's why Christians can't avoid political engagement. Politics is never the main content of Christian faith. It can never provide perfect solutions. But no Christian can avoid the duty to work for more justice and charity in our life as a nation, a task that inescapably involves politics. Thus the recent Senate vote to defund Planned Parenthood was not only right and timely, but necessary. And the failure of that measure involves a public failure of character by every Catholic senator who voted against it.

Memory is important: Two years ago Kermit Gosnell was stripped of his medical license and convicted of murdering three infants born alive from abortion procedures. He operated a Philadelphia abortion center that more closely resembled a butcher shop than a medical clinic. His clinic environment was uglier than the pleasant restaurants and offices captured on recent Center for Medical Progress (CMP) undercover videos. Those videos show a face of Planned Parenthood - senior staffers chatting blithely about the dismemberment and sale of fetal body parts - that can only be called repugnant. But it's not surprising: If aborted children are simply lumps of potentially useful (and profitable) tissue, what's the problem?

Again, memory is important: Thirty years ago "pro-choice" groups tried a strategy of using the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act to shut down certain forms of prolife witness. The strategy ultimately failed but - maybe it's God's sense of irony -- the word "racket" very quickly comes to mind in watching Planned Parenthood staff on the CMP videos.

I'll close with a word of thanks to Ruben Navarette, Jr. Navarette is a veteran "pro-choice" voice, but his August 10 column at the Daily Beast is worth reading and sharing for its honest revulsion at the whole, ugly, system-wide barbarism of Planned Parenthood's fetal trafficking. And his column's best lines come in quoting his prolife wife:

"Those are babies that are being killed. Millions of them. And you need to use your voice to protect them. That's what a man does. He protects children - his own children, and other children. That's what it means to be a man."

Amen.